MA, University of Cincinnati, 2001, Allied Health Sciences : Communication Sciences and Disorders
This study investigated a revision of the Auditory Fusion Test-Revised (AFT-R), the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) (Keith, 2001). The RGDT is used to identify disorders of auditory timing, referred to as temporal processing disorders and contains a practice subtest, and four subtests consisting of frequencies 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. A final subtest includes click stimuli. This revision attempts to randomize the stimuli, rather than have them presented in a systematic, and possibly predictable, increasing and decreasing interval. The advantage of the revised test is that subjects will be unable to predict subsequent intervals, and the revised test is designed to take less time to administer without sacrificing diagnostic utility. Specifically, this study was researched comparing two versions; Version I or a longer, Version II. In addition, this study examined the results between both subjects with presumed normal auditory systems, and construct validity data on subjects with possible disorders of the auditory system. Children between the ages of 5 and 11 years were assessed using either Version I or Version II. Normative data was obtained on twenty-four children; nine males and fifteen females for Version I, and on twenty-three children; nine males and fourteen females, for Version II. Construct validity data was obtained on twenty-one children; sixteen males and five females with possible disorders of the auditory system and on eleven children; nine males and two females; with possible disorders of the auditory system. Results using a Student t-test indicated that there is not a significant difference in average gap detection threshold when comparing Version I to Version II in both the standardized and construct validity studies; therefore, Version I can be used more quickly, and just as reliably to test for temporal processing disorders. In addition, due to a limited sample, no significant difference was observed when comparing the normative data with the c (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Dr. Robert Keith (Advisor)
Subjects: Health Sciences, Speech Pathology