BS, Kent State University, 2020, College of Arts and Sciences / Department of Anthropology
For many decades, the notion that bone adapts based on mechanical loading has been utilized by bioarchaeologists, anatomists, paleontologists and many educators. Understanding how bone is altered during life is critical in making inferences about the past. For decades, the interplay between genetics and environmental factors on bone morphology has been widely debated. Wolff's Law is an outdated law that states that bone adapts to mechanical loading. Wolff's Law is not a rigorous law, it is merely a hypothesis. The concept does not take into account new discoveries that have occurred after the late 19th century: such as genetics, epigenetic factors, hormonal factors, signaling factors, the age of bone, etc. In this review, the need for a revision of the basic ideas of Wolff's ālawā is demonstrated through the analysis of the previous reviews of Wolff's Law (Bertram and Swartz, 1991; Lovejoy et al., 2002; Pearson and Lieberman, 2004; Ruff et al., 2006). New studies are also investigated to further prove the major role of genetics in bone morphology (Serrat et al., 2003). Bone morphology is indeed a complex subject, and an outdated and vague disproven law should not be used to explain the effects of mechanical loading on bone remodeling. Thus, it should no longer be called Wolff's ālaw,ā but perhaps a principle on bone functional adaptation (Bertram and Swartz, 1991; Pearson and Lieberman, 2004; Ruff et al., 2006).
Committee: Linda Spurlock PhD (Advisor); C. Owen Lovejoy PhD (Committee Member)
Subjects: Biology; Genetics; Morphology