Ph.D., Antioch University, 2025, Leadership and Change
As schools increasingly adopt restorative practices, a parallel shift in leadership is occurring,
challenging traditional leadership models like servant and transformational leadership. While
research has largely focused on student outcomes, there is a critical gap in understanding how
restorative practices influence school principals' leadership. Given their central role in sustaining
and expanding restorative initiatives, this study aimed to address that gap by developing a
definitional framework for restorative leadership, grounded in the experiences of women school
leaders in grades 5 to 12. Using sensemaking theory, the research examined how leaders
conceptualize and apply restorative values in practice. Key questions included how restorative
leadership is understood, how it shapes leadership identity, and how it is enacted in practice. A
mixed-methods design was employed, integrating survey data (N = 52) and semi-structured
interviews (N = 12). Findings revealed that while 51.92% of participants recognized the term
“restorative leadership,” many were already practicing it without labeling it as such. Restorative
leadership emerged as a dynamic process of knowing, being, and doing, rooted in
self-awareness, relational repair, participatory decision-making, and collective well-being. It
challenges hierarchical paradigms and fosters inclusive school cultures, with the potential to
disrupt inequitable systems, improve school climates, and promote leader well-being. Based on
these findings, several key recommendations for action are proposed: establishing Restorative
Leadership Intensives (RLIs) to deepen principals' engagement with restorative practices,
integrating restorative leadership into leadership development programs and professional
certifications, advocating for gender-equitable leadership models that emphasize relational
strengths, and embedding restorative practices into school policies to create inclusive cultures.
These actions a (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Betty Overton-Atkins PhD (Committee Chair); Woden Teachout PhD (Committee Member); Linda Kligman PhD (Committee Member)
Subjects: Continuing Education; Curriculum Development; Education; Education Philosophy; Educational Leadership; Educational Psychology; Educational Sociology; Educational Theory; Ethics; Gender; Management; Peace Studies; School Administration; Social Psychology; Social Research; Sociology; Teacher Education; Teaching; Womens Studies