Doctor of Philosophy, The Ohio State University, 2016, Slavic and East European Languages and Literatures
This dissertation explores the way nineteenth-century Russian writers depict the lower classes, in particular the Russian peasants, in realist literature. In both the pre- and post-emancipation periods, Slavophiles, Westernizers, radicals, populists, pan-Slavists, and academic authors such as historians and ethnographers all explored the mentality of the Russian people, or narod, and their supposed exemplary moral character. Under the influence of this cultural myth about the lower-class Russian masses' morality and spirituality, critics of realist literature often claim that lower-class characters possess spiritual strength and collectively forge a Christian brotherhood. Close reading of realist literature, however, reveals that influential writers such as Fyodor Dostoevsky, Leo Tolstoy, and Ivan Turgenev also depict the Russian peasants as morally flawed. By uncovering the way such writers subvert the myth of the people's brotherly union, this research compares the ambivalent portrait of Russian peasants in literature with their idealized image in academic writings. I argue that the realist writers questioned the unambiguously optimistic vision of the Russian people's unity and called for a universal endeavor to build a Christian brotherhood.
Demarcated from both nineteenth-century intelligentsia and contemporary academics, the realist writers in the age of radicalism were concerned that the spiritual brotherhood of the Russian people was far from emerging. To demonstrate their ambivalent and pessimistic observations on the peasants' moral condition, I first explore the realist writers' portrayals of their communal life. In the first chapter, I demonstrate that although academic studies tend to regard peasant communes in Imperial Russia as models for realizing villagers' mutual love and egalitarian values, realist writers depict peasant characters' rage, violence, and conflicts in their seemingly collectivist communities. Second, while by traditional lin (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Alexander Burry (Advisor)
Subjects: Russian History; Slavic Literature; Slavic Studies