Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, 2024, Psychology/Industrial-Organizational
Within cross-cultural analyses, specifically measurement invariance studies, cultures are often compared at the national level (e.g., invariance across French and German cultures). However, the presence of cultural variation within nations, on factors such as region, level of urbanization, gender, or ethnic roots, presents an added level of complexity that is often ignored in these analyses The current study used mixture model item response theory (MMIRT) to determine the adequacy of nationality as a proxy for culture in the United States, Indian, and Austrian contexts using a combined American, Indian, and Austrian sample collected from multiple data sources (N = 986). More specifically, this study asks if more granular variables such as gender or individual-level cultural beliefs are more strongly related (compared to country) to response patterns using Howard's (2017) Workplace Courage Scale. This was achieved through examining significant covariates of latent class membership within MMIRT models with a mixed American, Indian, and Austrian sample. Covariates examined include Hofstede's (2001) cultural dimensions (at the individual level of analysis), demographic variables, autonomy, employee voice, and leader-member exchange, which were also subjected to measurement invariance testing (barring demographics) specifically across the American and Indian samples. Power distance orientation and uncertainty avoidance orientation emerged as statistically significant drivers of response pattern, while no demographic variables, including nation, emerged.
Committee: Michael Zickar Ph.D. (Committee Chair); Amy French Ph.D. (Other); Meagan Docherty Ph.D. (Committee Member); Samuel McAbee Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Subjects: Organizational Behavior; Psychology; Quantitative Psychology