Master of Science, The Ohio State University, 2021, Dentistry
Background: Sound decisions regarding appropriate treatments are dependent
on health information for the entire population. Previous studies have shown
wide variations in medical and dental treatments regarding health care use over
well-defined geographic areas. More specifically, trends in periodontal therapy
may vary between states irrespective of the disease prevalence. This study will
explore potential differences in private insurance claims data to determine if
variations exist between periodontal practices in Michigan and Ohio from 2010 to
2020.
Methods: Current dental terminology (CDT) codes for diagnostic, preventive,
periodontal, oral and maxillofacial surgery and adjunctive general services were
compared between Michigan and Ohio periodontists. The retrospective data
collected for claims included the number of procedures performed per year for
each state, the total of procedures per year for each state divided by the number
of providers, and the grand total of claims from all years. The total number of
procedures per provider, per year, with the mean ± the standard error of the
mean was also included
Results: A significant difference was found between Michigan and Ohio in many
dental procedures. Michigan claimed more CDT diagnostic (552,419 vs 178,356),
preventive (55,085 vs 15,083), periodontal (1,103,884 vs 348,242), implant
(58,083 vs 35,070), oral and maxillofacial surgical (126,483 vs 85,078) and
adjunctive general (30,994 vs 18,334), codes than Ohio.
Conclusions: There was significant variation in dental treatments between
Michigan and Ohio, suggesting dental care guidelines vary between the states.
Committee: Angelo Mariotti (Advisor); Jeffery Johnston (Committee Member); Eric Seiber (Committee Member)
Subjects: Dental Care; Dentistry