Skip to Main Content

Basic Search

Skip to Search Results
 
 
 

Left Column

Filters

Right Column

Search Results

Search Results

(Total results 2)

Mini-Tools

 
 

Search Report

  • 1. Longsmith, Rebecca A BIOLOGICAL MONITORING INTERNSHIP WITH THE OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF SURFACE WATER

    Master of Environmental Science, Miami University, 2016, Environmental Sciences

    The following report contains a summary of my experience interning as a Macroinvertebrate Sampling Intern with the Division of Surface Water at the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Based out of the Groveport Field Office in Groveport, Ohio, my internship consisted chiefly of assisting in the collection of macroinvertebrate samples from streams and their tributaries throughout the state. This macroinvertebrate data can be used by the agency to make policy decisions, direct enforcement activities, and locate areas for improvement and further study.

    Committee: Suzanne Zazycki (Advisor); Sarah Dumyahn (Committee Member); Jonathan Levy (Committee Member) Subjects: Environmental Science
  • 2. Peterson, Sarah The role of sampling density in the accuracy of water quality assessment: A case study of 9 Ohio watersheds and the Wadeable Streams Assessment

    Master of Environmental Science, Miami University, 2011, Environmental Sciences

    State and federal agencies measure water quality in streams using different sampling regimes. The Ohio EPA uses geometric sampling of 80+ sites in 11 digit HUC watersheds, whereas the US EPA uses probabilistic sampling of 25 sites in Ohio. I analyzed OEPA fish (IBI) and macroinvertebrate (ICI) indices from 9 watersheds (3 agricultural, 3 urban, and 3 with little disturbance) along with US EPA data. Results suggest that the number of sites sampled by OEPA is insufficient to reproduce statistically similar IBI or ICI scores. Most sites should be sampled on third order streams and the least on first and fifth order streams. Similarly, more sites should be sampled in agricultural watersheds than in least disturbed or urban watersheds. IBI scores from OEPA and US EPA were positively correlated, but ICI scores were negatively correlated. Both OEPA and US EPA need to collect more data to manage and improve watersheds.

    Committee: Donna McCollum PhD (Advisor); Thomas Crist PhD (Committee Member); Robert Schaefer PhD (Committee Member) Subjects: Biology; Environmental Science; Environmental Studies; Geography