Master of Science, The Ohio State University, 2018, Horticulture and Crop Science
In Ohio, many organic farmers use the term `balancing' to express the rationale of using a wide variety of soil amendments to improve soil quality and plant health. Soil balancing or the base cation saturation ratio (BCSR) approach is a method first proposed more than 100 years ago that aims to achieve the `ideal soil'. William Albrecht in the 1970's concluded that if saturation of the major exchangeable cations is 65-85% for Ca, 6-12% for Mg, and 2-5% for K, plant nutrition will be balanced. Research conducted by Zwickle et al. (2011) indicated that many organic farmers believe balanced soils produce higher quality crops and have diminished weed infestations compared to unbalanced soils. For many farmers, soil balancing includes using amendments thought to enhance soil biology and increase the soil's capacity to store and release minerals needed by plants. Combined mineral and these organic/bio-active soil products can be very costly, as much as US $1000-1250/ha in the first year. While farmers believe they are benefiting from these expenditures, there is no objective evidence to confirm their belief. I conducted on-farm studies at six locations in Northeast Ohio, with the overall goal of determining the effect of gypsum, with or without “biological stimulants”, on the soil microbial community, crop quality, weed populations, and soil chemical characteristics. Soil seed bank and soil health/biological properties were measured, including soil respiration, active carbon, protein content, microbial biomass, and complete mineral analysis. Crop foliage for nutrient analysis, and crop quality was determined after harvest. Differences in final soil nutrient levels, base saturation, crop and weed community effects were influenced more by the farm than by the treatments applied. After two years, soil sulfur levels were significantly higher in plots amended with gypsum. Failure to detect treatment response by other mineral amendments suggests the relatively narrow difference (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Douglas Doohan (Advisor); Warren DIck (Committee Member); Kleinhenz Matthew (Committee Member); Steve Culman (Committee Member)
Subjects: Agriculture; Horticulture; Soil Sciences