Doctor of Philosophy, The Ohio State University, 2015, English

An apparent rift exists between the anti-aesthetic emphasis in postmodern and contemporary literary theory, on the one hand, and readerly appreciations of and engagements with the aesthetic, on the other. This tension between anti-aesthetic critical paradigms and aesthetic experiences of fiction is the central problem I examine in my dissertation. By putting philosophical, aesthetical, narrative, and literary traditions in conversation with each other, I propose a new framework for understanding aesthetic impulses at work in twentieth- and twenty-first-century fiction by revising Immanuel Kant's and Friedrich Schiller's heuristic tools and categories—which I argue remain pertinent to understanding twentieth and twenty-first century fiction. Drawing on these and other contributions to aesthetic theory, I suggest that post-war fiction is dominantly concerned with the harmonies, engagements, and tensions between what I term the form-drive, the moral-drive, and the sense-drive, in relation to readerly roles and responses. Part I includes two chapters devoted to play, which I characterize as the dominant aesthetic energy that characterizes postmodernist fiction (McHale). My analysis of Flann O'Brien's At Swim-Two-Birds (1939) and Alasdair Gray's Lanark (1981) relates to readers' inhabitation and orientation of the playful, complex ontological worlds of postmodern fiction. I use the tension/conflict between the form- and sense-drives to characterize the aesthetic category of play, and suggest that Marie-Laure Ryan's possible-worlds theory provides a useful critical apparatus for explicating how the form-drive functions as a system of ordering in readers' navigations of these ontologically-complex fictional worlds. Part II deals with the ways in which twentieth- and twenty-first-century fiction has reinvigorated traditional aesthetic categories. In chapter three, I use Flann O'Brien's The Third Policeman (1939-40/1967) and Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian (1985) to demon (open full item for complete abstract)

Committee: Brian McHale (Advisor); David Herman (Committee Member); James Phelan (Committee Member) Subjects: Aesthetics; American Literature; British and Irish Literature; Ethics; Literature

Master of Arts, The Ohio State University, 2008, Music

In the face of increasing consolidation of the radio market, a more conservative political climate, and growing sensitivity to public dissent in the wake of the Patriot Act, there has been a dearth of anti-war music in the mass music market since 2001. While country radio has provided a platform for the musical articulation of pro-war positions, YouTube, a video-sharing website, has become a place where the increasingly individual experience of listening to anti-war music can be supplemented with more communal listening. On YouTube, users on both sides of the war debate can create their own political mashups, a medium comprised of mixed audio samples and/or mixed video samples preserved for public consumption. Observing the behavior as a silent participant on the message boards corresponding to mashups of Toby Keith's "Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue (The Angry American)" and John Lennon's "Imagine," I demonstrate that political communities with specific communication and aesthetic values are being formed around these multimedia signs. Online communities offer a somewhat more democratic alternative for public articulation of political positions; however, the rhetoric of the online communities and of the larger musical-political climate post-9/11 is considerably parallel. Examining mashups from an aesthetic perspective reveals postmodern principles at work on multiple levels. The lines that once separated creators, producers, and consumers are blurred as editing software becomes available to more people, and as the flow of information increases. Producers and consumers no longer negotiate the meanings of particular signifiers within the confines of hierarchical corporate structures: these signifiers are now easily resignified, and reappropriated to make new meanings in different contexts. The increasing flow of information and postmodern principles of fragmentation and multiplicity that characterize mashups position users differently than more coherent, narrativ (open full item for complete abstract)

Committee: Danielle Fosler-Lussier PhD (Advisor); Daniel Avorgbedor PhD (Committee Member); David Staley PhD (Committee Member) Subjects: American Studies; Mass Media; Music

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Ohio University, 2006, Comparative Arts (Fine Arts)

This study, utilizing Michel Foucault's theory from which to interpret visual abnormality in art, analyzes the reasons why the Nazis believed visual dysfunction and mental illness were the operative forces behind modern art. In Munich, Germany in 1937 the National Socialist party, fearing that German culture was slowly degenerating into madness, sponsored two art events largely for the purposes of contrast. At the largely monolithic Great German Art Exhibition the Nazis hastened to forward their own aesthetic vision by displaying art works representing human forms in the language of classicism. The Degenerate Art Exhibition (held a day later) showcased early twentieth-century German avant-garde paintings, which, the Nazis claimed, were the products of abnormal vision and mental illness. The importance of visual perception in art is first detected in the period Foucault identifies as the Classical episteme, a period that regards man's capacity for representation as the primary tool for ordering knowledge about the world. The roots of this way of thinking about representation go back to the fifteenth-century theorist Leonbattista Alberti, who established rules in art for the normal and healthy perception of nature. Such rules, including linear perspective and an emphasis on line, continued to be supported after the advent of what Foucault calls the Modern episteme, which began roughly around the late eighteenth century. The Modern episteme still regarded man's knowledge of the world as fundamentally representational, but, in addition, saw man's representational capacities as an object of knowledge. This line of thought contributed to Immanuel Kant's theory of knowledge, in particular his view on how the subjective awareness of beauty opens up for the subjects solidarity with others in judging beauty, that is, a judgment of taste's claim to universality. Kant's aesthetics thus becomes a space where a consensus about the visual perception of art is now possible. This ty (open full item for complete abstract)

Committee: Charles Buchanan (Advisor) Subjects: