Ph.D., Antioch University, 2024, Leadership and Change
Fighting false information, propaganda, open lies, rumors, misinformation, and disinformation
by attacking it directly and challenging it is the dominant strategy for dealing with false beliefs
(Lazer et al., 2018; Maseri et al., 2020; Van Bavel et al., 2021), and it is an important one.
Refuting falsity is crucial. At the same time, there are instances when fighting false information
does not work (Ardevol-Abreu et al., 2020; McIntyre, 2018; Van Bavel et al., 2021). One of the
reasons is that it denies another's worldview, belief systems, and, as a result, their identity and
even right to exist. Searching for alternative strategies for dealing with falsity, this study used
qualitative research methodology and conducted three focus group discussions. My research
findings show that identifying and framing a narrative behind falsity shifts the dynamic from
facts to interaction, from fighting to beginning relationships to that narrative, and potentially
people who stand for it, consciously or unconsciously. It allows one to find a belief system and a
worldview of the other, and to engage and interact with it. Thus, there is a shift from finding who
is telling the truth or lies to providing space for various belief systems and worldviews to interact
with each other. Making this shift changes the power dynamic and empowers human beings to
stop being simply victims of falsity and gain agency. My research also shows that there is a high
need for talent and skills to hold polarities and different narratives, allowing them to co-exist and
not deny each other, facilitating unpredictable and unimaginable ways to interact with each
other, and bring more flow into communication instead of distancing even further. Finding narratives behind falsity and holding the opposite stories allow one to see falsity as not just an
absolute evil, but potentially meaningful, transforming it into an opportunity for community-building processes and for people to work on differe (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Christopher Voparil PhD (Committee Chair); Jennifer Raymond PhD (Committee Member); Nader Robert Shabahangi PhD (Committee Member)
Subjects: Behavioral Sciences; Communication; Information Science; Journalism; Mass Communications; Social Research