Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Ohio University, 2021, Curriculum and Instruction Mathematics Education (Education)
In school mathematics, students' opportunity to learn varies according to the
nature of instruction. Mathematical tasks––that is, problems or activities for student
engagement––are critical instructional tools that shape students' mathematical thinking
and reasoning. The cognitive demand of a task––the amount, types, and levels of thinking
required to solve it––often changes as a teacher modifies the task during planning, setup,
and implementation with students. Therefore, school mathematics teachers are
instrumental in determining what and how much students learn through their selection
and implementation of instructional tasks.
This study explored the perspectives of 9 high school mathematics teachers on
their selection, planning, setup, and implementation of mathematical tasks and identified
the teachers' reasons for instructional decisions at each of these four phases. Using a
thematic analysis approach, the researcher interviewed teachers before and after
observing the enactment of a high cognitive demand task. Interviews also focused on
teachers' perspectives of how their task unfolded and the cognitive demand associated
with each phase of the task. The researcher and a co-observer analyzed each teacher's
instructional task as it was (a) selected from curricular source materials, (b) adjusted during the teacher's planning, (c) set up prior to student engagement, and (d) implemented with students, using the Instructional Quality Assessment rubrics (Boston, 2012) at each phase.
Interview data yielded 18 themes for teachers' task use: 5 for task selection, 5 for
task planning, 3 for task setup, and 5 for task implementation. When selecting tasks,
teachers frequently considered their learning environment (face-to-face, remote, or
hybrid), potential student engagement, real-world contexts, mathematical content, and
previous success with the task. During planning, teachers were flexible, adjusted their
plan based on the (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Gregory Foley (Committee Chair); Allyson Hallman-Thrasher (Committee Member); Mathew Felton-Koestler (Committee Member); Gordon Brooks (Committee Member); Melissa Boston (Committee Member)
Subjects: Education; Mathematics; Mathematics Education; Teacher Education; Teaching