Skip to Main Content

Basic Search

Skip to Search Results
 
 
 

Left Column

Filters

Right Column

Search Results

Search Results

(Total results 1)

Mini-Tools

 
 

Search Report

  • 1. Young, Josiah Tracking a Baseball During a Color Naming Task

    Master of Science, The Ohio State University, 2009, Vision Science

    Baseball players of all ages work on improving their skills during practice. Some more recent training methods have worked on vision training to improve hitting skills. One particular method involves using a pitching machine to throw tennis balls at a high velocity. The goal of this training is to be able to call out colored numbers written on the tennis balls as they are pitched, as this relates to pitch recognition during game play. There has been no scientific research done on this system to see whether or not players are able to improve their tracking ability. This study seeks to investigate the tracking accuracy of subjects using the color naming task. Subjects were tested using a pitching machine called the Flamethrower. Tennis balls with numbers written in either black or red ink were fed at random into the Flamethrower for each pitch. Balls were pitched from a distance of 60.75 feet from home plate. The average velocity was 79.76 MPH for each pitch. Eye movements were recorded using the ISCAN infrared tracking device, while head movement were recorded using the mini-Bird 800, which was mounted to the ISCAN goggles. Raw data from these devices were converted to digital format, compared, and analyzed with a computer program written in Visual Basic 6.0. Thirty subjects were assigned at random into one of three groups. The subjects' tasks in these three groups were color (and number) naming of a pitched ball, tracking the ball as well as one can, and coordinating the eye and head as one would when batting. Subjects wore the ISCAN goggles to record data during each pitch. Data was recorded on total of 2950 pitches between the three groups. The primary outcome measure was mean gaze error away from the location of the ball, which was measured at 6 feet in front of the plate. Mean gaze error for groups 1 , 2, and 3 were -4.81 degrees (StDev 4.30), -2.20 degrees(StDev 6.08), and -3.03 degrees (StDev 5.82) respectively. A one-way analysis of variance with Tukey (open full item for complete abstract)

    Committee: Nicklaus Fogt Ph.D. (Advisor); Gregory Good Ph.D. (Committee Member); Jeffrey Walline Ph.D. (Committee Member) Subjects: Biophysics; Optics; Physical Education; Sports Medicine