Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, 2024, Higher Education Administration
Online student enrollment has grown over the past 20 years and accelerated due to the COVID-19 pandemic (U.S. DOE, 1999, 2021c). For students to be successful in their courses, they must understand their self-regulation and motivation (Seli & Dembo, 2020). Self-regulation involves goal setting, metacognition, help-seeking, time management, and outcome strategies. Motivation involves intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and self-efficacy. Self-regulated learning and motivation use two theoretical frameworks. Zimmerman's self-regulated learning theory concentrated on an online environment (Zimmerman & Moylan, 2009). Vygotsky's sociocultural theory centered on understanding students' learning experiences in a face-to-face environment (McCaslin & Hickey, 2001), but his theory can be applied to online learning (Tu & Yen, 2007). The purpose of this quantitative study was to understand students' perceptions of their self-regulation and motivation in online learning to help administrators and faculty know where students perceived they were when they began or continued throughout their programs to help foster students' future learning. Self-regulation and motivation were operationalized through my survey with six subscales across the two measures.
The study found positive, strong, significant relationships between students' self-regulation and motivation with all, new, and continuing online students; continuing students had the strongest overall self-regulation and motivation relationship. The strongest intercorrelation relationships were between self-efficacy and outcome strategies for all, new, and continuing students, and the weakest intercorrelation relationships were between help-seeking and all subscales.
The study found no overall group differences in self-regulation and motivation of online students, with two exceptions. Statistically significant differences between genders on the self-efficacy subscale were found (p = .04), with female students having greater se (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Julia Matuga Ph.D. (Committee Chair); Frederick Busselle Ph.D. (Other); Patrick Pauken J.D., Ph.D. (Committee Chair); Maureen Wilson Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Subjects: Educational Psychology; Higher Education; Higher Education Administration