PhD, University of Cincinnati, 2001, Arts and Sciences : Psychology
Conflict within young adult friendships has been underrepresented in the literature to date. This experiment examined the effects of gender, situational roles (change seeker vs. status quo maintainer), the focus of an individual's thoughts immediately prior to engaging in a conflict (participants were instructed to either think about the other person, think about themselves, or received no instructions), and negative affect on the use of five different conflict resolution strategies. 114 same-sex college student dyads participated in a role-play of a realistic conflict between close friends. The role-play interaction was videotaped, and each individual's communication was coded into competitive, collaborative, cooperative, accommodating, or avoidant strategies. Due to skewed and truncated distributions of the dependent variables, negative binomial regression was used to analyze the data. The resulting regression equation had a likelihood ratio chi-square (35) of 1216.97, p < .001, and a pseudo R 2 of .176. The analyses showed competition, followed by collaboration, cooperation, accommodation, and avoidance, to be the most likely response regardless of other variables. Women were more likely to compete than men. Individuals who were in the role of change seeker were more likely to both compete and avoid than individuals who were in the role of status quo maintainer. Conversely, individuals in the status quo maintenance role were more likely to collaborate, cooperate, and accommodate than the change seekers. Thoughts prior to the conflict had minimal effects on conflict resolution strategies. Finally, increased negative affect led to significantly more competition and less collaboration.
Committee: David Lundgren (Advisor)
Subjects: