Doctor of Education, Miami University, 2021, Educational Leadership
Grading involves a multifaceted evaluative practice that often requires the teacher to make judgements about student learning. Teachers, of course, tend to believe grades should primarily represent student achievement to properly communicate to students and parents how well students have mastered the standards of a course (Marzano, 2000). Student achievement is defined by Sadler (2010) as the attainment of an identifiable level of knowledge as determined through evaluating performances on assessment tasks, as designated by the course grade. Grades are perceived to hold much power including the social status and future successes of the students, the teacher's effectiveness, the overall success of the school district, and more. For these reasons few issues have ever created more anxiety and, at times, distrust than those policies associated with grading and the reporting of student learning.
When looking at grading policies, we must be confident that all stakeholders can define what value the grade holds relative to a student's development in the subject matter. Those stakeholders must know that a grade earned indicates a level of subject material mastery, they must feel confident that grades are consistent within subject matters, departments, districts, and the state.
This embedded case study integrated qualitative and quantitative methods to explore 1) if the grade a teacher assigns at the end of a class is reflective of success on state assessments and 2) what meaning teachers and students put on a final course grade. Using a sequential explanatory design, End of Course (EOC) Scaled Test Scores from a suburban high school's 2018 English Language Arts II (10th grade test) and Geometry (10th grade test) courses were used to examine whether there was a significant relationship between EOC Scaled Test Scores for these two subject matters and end of class grades. Indeed, this study revealed that the grade assigned at the end of a class period is a predictor of (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Lucian Szlizewski Dr. (Committee Co-Chair); Joel Malin Dr. (Committee Member); Stephanie Baer Dr. (Committee Member)
Subjects: Education; Education History; Education Philosophy; Education Policy; Educational Leadership; Educational Theory