MA, Kent State University, 2017, College of Arts and Sciences / Department of Philosophy
I explore certain acute and timely tensions between contemporary, postmodern philosophy and
the popular status of religious tradition. Such tensions appear to draw much of their strength
from two prominent sources: Nietzsche's announcement of the death of the transcendent God,
and Heidegger's rejection of absolutist metaphysics. The problem is that if the transcendent
God has become superfluous to thought, and the treatment of the absolute metaphysical nature
of things has become taboo, then the special status of religious claims as revealed, absolute
truths of a transcendent Being, and of the natures of the world and humanity, has been
seriously called into question. I will show that a consideration of two particular religious
thinkers – Martin Buber and Ralph Waldo Emerson – will equip us with a sophisticated
response in the current philosophical environment of postmodernity, and provide us with the
resources to construct a nuanced religious narrative of creation, sin, and salvation within the
broader contexts of metaphysical immanence, epistemological intertwining, and ethical
instrumentalization that has followed in the de-absolutizing path laid by, among others,
Nietzsche and Heidegger. Through an examination of the dialogical relations between persons
described by Buber, and the relations of discipline between persons and the world described by
Emerson, we will be able to resurrect a sense of immanent, non-absolute religious practice in the
era of postmodernity, after the death of the transcendent God and the end of absolutist
metaphysics.
Committee: Frank Ryan (Advisor)
Subjects: Philosophy