Doctor of Philosophy, The Ohio State University, 2017, Psychology
Metacognition describes the ability to represent and access our own cognitive processes. This ability is crucial for understanding and optimizing how we learn and remember, allowing us to avoid strategies that have not worked for us in the past, and to continue using strategies that have. Metacognition has been described as involving two components, monitoring and control, which may have different developmental trajectories. In the current project, we addressed several remaining questions about metacognition and its development. How do monitoring and control develop? How do these components interact? Is metacognitive proficiency malleable in childhood? What kinds of information do children rely on to monitor and control behavior? In 8 experiments, these questions were addressed by using scaffolding such as feedback and strategy instruction to improve metacognitive performance across the lifespan. In Experiment 1, 5-year-olds, 7-year-olds, and adults' metacognitive monitoring and control were tested in a task that required them to initiate these processes spontaneously, demonstrating developmental differences in both monitoring and control. In Experiment 2, 5-year-olds were presented with performance feedback, strategy instruction, or both to assess their effects on the monitoring and control components. Whereas feedback influenced task monitoring, it did not influence metacognitive control. In addition, whereas strategy instruction improved control, it did not influence performance monitoring. These findings were expanded upon in Experiments 3, 4, and 5, wherein 5-year-olds, 7-year-olds, and adults were provided with no scaffolding, strategy instruction, or feedback, respectively, to assess whether monitoring and control can function independently. Across the age groups, feedback improved performance monitoring, but not metacognitive control. In addition, strategy instruction improved control, but not performance monitoring. These findings suggest a dissociation bet (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Vladimir Sloutsky (Advisor); Andrew Leber (Committee Member); John Opfer (Committee Member)
Subjects: Developmental Psychology; Psychology