Master of Arts, Miami University, 2015, Psychology
The current study explored the impact of voicing non-consent, defined as telling the perpetrator “no” or “stop” before or during unwanted sex, in relation to experiences of rape. Aims of the study were to determine: (1) if voicing non-consent was related to qualitative differences in rape experiences (e.g., familiarity with the perpetrator, type of resistance used, or label assigned to experience), and (2) if voicing non-consent was related to differences in how women respond to rape (e.g., level of distress, beliefs about recovery, or attributions of blame). A subsample of 223 rape victims obtained from a sample of 1,293 college women completed anonymous questionnaires assessing past sexual victimization, characteristics of assault experiences, responses to the event, and symptoms of distress. Results indicated that voicing of non-consent was associated with increased likelihood of using physical resistance, greater endorsement of the rape label, and elevated PTS symptoms. Implications for intervention are discussed.
Committee: Terri Messman-Moore Ph.D (Advisor); Margaret O’Dougherty Wright Ph.D (Committee Member); Elizabeth Kiel Luebbe Ph.D (Committee Member)
Subjects: Psychology; Womens Studies