MARCH, University of Cincinnati, 2012, Design, Architecture, Art and Planning: Architecture
Those in power have traditionally defined the historical narrative in a tangible way, with monuments and physical symbols of culture. Those without the resources to build leave only traces of their narrative behind; these traces may become harder to discern as those who created them fade into the past. These fragments left behind in an urban fabric are accumulated and their organization lends itself to the framing of an overlooked narrative. The archive is a physical manifestation of the processing of these fragments. The works of John Soane, Carlo Scarpa, and Peter Zumthor, in addition to the writings of Alois Riegl, Michel Foucault, and Rem Koolhaas, address a means of working with the fragment in architecture and history. Within the structure of the archive, there are three ways of working with fragments. First is a chronological, layered approach, focusing on the origin of the fragment. Second, the fragments may be sorted and classified according to their similarities or differences, focusing on typologies. Lastly, the fragments may be combined in a way that crafts a fictional narrative that presents history as it never truly existed. Through an examination of the methodologies of archiving, a framework can be developed for the appropriation of fragments, both tangible and intangible, in Philadelphia's Old City. This framework will structure the crafting of the overlooked history of Philadelphia's industrial workers during the nineteenth century.
Committee: Aarati Kanekar PhD (Committee Chair); Michael McInturf MARCH (Committee Member)
Subjects: Architecture