Master of Arts in Theology, Mount St. Mary's Seminary & School of Theology, 2015, School of Theology
One of the questions that Catholic theologians have debated for centuries pertains to the true meaning behind St. Paul's statement, “that in all things, he [Christ] may have the first place [primacy]” (Colossians 1:18). The beginning stages of the debate presented it as a counter-factual claim concerning whether the God-man would have come had Adam and Eve not sinned. One position suggested that the Incarnation was directed toward redemption and gave a negative answer; the opposing position stated that Christ's primacy spoken of by St. Paul was not dependent on anything outside of God's will, and gave a positive answer.
This thesis seeks to examine the work of the major contributors to both sides of the debate, starting with St. Anselm's Cur Deus Homo and closing with the work of Bl. John Duns Scotus. In doing this, it will examine in what ways the question developed throughout the Church's history, what the major contributors to the question truly sought to answer in engaging the question, and why it became such a central and foundational question for the major theologians involved in the debate. What will be seen through this method is that, though the question began as a hypothetical concerning an alternate economy of salvation, theologians like St. Bonaventure and Bl. John Duns Scotus moved it beyond its hypothetical formulation by recognizing that it actually concerned two opposing theological viewpoints on the Incarnation and created universe. The conclusions of this thesis will further show how, at this point, the hypothetical can only obscure the true nature of the question since it does not recognize how fundamentally it affects our understanding of the economy of salvation. It will also show that method has played a role in how the question is approached and answered throughout the Church's history.
Committee: Anthony Brausch Ph.L. (Advisor)
Subjects: Theology