Doctor of Philosophy, The Ohio State University, 2021, Communication
Political homophily, or the tendency for relationships or discussion ties to form more frequently between like-partisans than between people with differing political identities, is a well-studied phenomenon in the political communication and social networks literatures. Such political similarity has been observed in a variety of contexts, including in work environments, church congregations, universities, romantic relationships, neighborhoods, and online social media. Homophilous network structures have profound effects on normative democratic outcomes, such as participation and exposure to diverse sources of information. However, comparatively little attention has been paid to the antecedent processes which give rise to political homophily.
This dissertation advances the concept of political selectivity, or the degree to which one's decisions about the status of ties in a political discussion network favor discussion partners who one perceives to be similar (i.e., shared party identity) to themselves. The culmination of networked theories of homophily, along with interpersonal theories of relational uncertainty and topic avoidance, together provide a holistic view of how the dyadic and network structures co-evolve over time. The goals of this dissertation are threefold: to isolate selection from other generative mechanisms, to explain individual variances in selectivity, and to provide a framework with which interpersonal processes, like topic avoidance, affect selection in dynamic discussion networks.
To these ends, a five-phase, two-condition quasi-experiment was conducted in which participants shared political opinions with one another and made decisions regarding who they would like to continue discussing political matters with. Subjects (n = 366) were recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk participant pool into 24 cohorts. In condition 1, participants shared their opinions with each of their alters; in condition 2, participants were permitted to decide from (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Robert Bond (Advisor); Skyler Cranmer (Committee Member); William Eveland Jr. (Committee Member); Hillary Shulman (Committee Member)
Subjects: Communication; Political Science