Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) in Organizational Leadership , Franklin University, 2022, International Institute for Innovative Instruction
This quantitative, causal-comparative, ex post facto study examined the effectiveness of
alternative schools in the United States, with a geographic focus on Dayton, Ohio. Dayton
schools were chosen as representative of nationwide issues faced by alternative schools, also
referred to as Dropout Recovery Schools (DORPs) or last chance schools, which primarily
serve students classified as at-risk. These DORPs function as public community schools,
typically operate independently of local school districts, and have accountability metrics
measured through an alternative state report card, and typically serve students at risk of
dropping out of high school. Reasons being deemed as at-risk for dropping out include
academic detachment, lack of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, poor attendance patterns,
economic issues, inadequate student-teacher relationships, lack of hope, and inequitable
education offerings. Therefore, this study briefly explored the history and factors leading to
necessary education reforms and the development of nontraditional public schools. It
examined whether DORPs were viable for the at-risk students they service and compares
academic performance and graduation metrics against the local school district in which the
DORPs are located. Ex post facto data were used from the Ohio Department of Education,
covering achievement, enrollment, school district income levels, and student poverty levels.
These data were analyzed to determine whether or not Dayton's five DORPs positively or
negatively impact at-risk youth. The analysis yielded several insights relevant to those
working to level the educational playing field for at-risk students considering nontraditional
education in Dayton, Ohio, and similar urban cities.
Committee: Niccole Hyatt (Committee Chair); Sherry Abernathy (Committee Member); Donis Toler (Committee Member)
Subjects: Education