Doctor of Philosophy, The Ohio State University, 2017, EDU Teaching and Learning
Mathematical classroom discourse has been identified as a key element in students' cognitive development (e.g., Forman, 1996; Lampert & Cobb, 2003; Yackel, Cobb, & Wood, 1991). In constructivist-based, inquiry classrooms, discussions can be an important way for students to use interactions within their social environment to build personal mathematical understanding. This approach is also consistent with sociocultural views on learning. “Academic mathematical Discourse practices can be understood in general as using language and other symbols systems to talk, think, and participate in the practices that lead to literate mathematical Discourse practices that are the `the objective of school learning'” (Moskovich, 2007, p. 28). The iterative process of sending and receiving communications within the mathematics classroom can shape students' learning and mathematical dispositions. Researchers argue that as students write about their thinking, talk about their thinking with others, and respond thoughtfully to others' mathematical ideas, they build understandings of mathematics from these interactions (Empson, 2003; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2001; Yackel, 2002). While researchers agree that mathematical classroom discourse is a crucial element in students' cognitive development, exactly what role discourse plays in regulating students' cognitive development is undefined.
Given a cognitive continuum from the conceptual understanding and reasoning students bring to school to the standards or school learning outcomes of mathematics classrooms, learning progressions describe “the successively more sophisticated ways of thinking about an idea that follow one another as students learn” (Wilson & Bertenthal, 2005, p. 48). Battista's research on geometry learning (1992, 2009) and Learning Progression for Geometric Shapes (2007) makes evident that increases in sophistication of conceptualization are marked by and coincide with changes in language. For (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Michael Battista PhD (Advisor); Theodore Chao PhD (Committee Member); Karen Irving PhD (Committee Member)
Subjects: Mathematics Education