Doctor of Philosophy, University of Akron, 2017, Psychology-Industrial/Organizational
Simulation and gaming have become ubiquitous in training curricula, especially in support of military operations. These capabilities provide low-cost, low-risk pedagogical opportunities, and game and simulation-based training (SBT) offer high-fidelity, adaptable and relevant learning experiences for more effective and enduring training. Feedback, and specifically real-time feedback, is a learning tool that can enhance SBT outcomes by giving trainees immediate, personalized performance information and guidance to trainees. This study examined the use of dynamic, real-time visual feedback displays on SBT effectiveness in a military training environment. Three different feedback schedules were introduced as novel feedback interventions in a custom-built SBT teaching novice pilots to fly a generic fighter aircraft. The faded condition contained high-intrusion feedback in the first training block, followed by medium-intrusion feedback in the second block and low-intrusion feedback in the final block. The increasing condition contained the opposite schedule, with low-intrusion feedback in the first training block, medium-intrusion feedback in the second block and high-intrusion feedback in the last block. The static condition contained both low and medium-intrusion feedback throughout training. These schedules were compared against a control condition containing no real-time feedback. The self-concordance model, driven by self-determination theory, led to the prediction that a social factor (real-time feedback
and faded feedback, in particular) would predict competence and autonomy need satisfaction in trainees. This would enhance trainees' goal self-concordance which would lead to stronger SBT outcomes of higher performance, knowledge acquisition, transfer, and more positive feedback reactions than having no real-time feedback. Results indicated that overall, real-time feedback interventions produced stronger performance outcomes throughout the training period than th (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Joelle Elicker Dr. (Advisor); Steven Ash Dr. (Committee Member); James Diefendorff Dr. (Committee Member); Dennis Doverspike Dr. (Committee Member); Paul Levy Dr. (Committee Member)
Subjects: Psychology