PHD, Kent State University, 2022, College of Arts and Sciences / Department of Psychological Sciences
Given the broad negative effects of stress on people's daily lives, health, and relationships (Black & Garbutt, 2002; Bodenmann, 2000; Neff & Karney, 2004; Sin et al., 2015), knowing the degree to which romantic partners perceive each other's stress accurately and/or with biases can be critical to understanding how couples interpret stress, communicate about stress, help each other cope with stress, and ultimately mitigate the negative effects of stress to maintain a successful relationship. Using intake and daily diary data collected online from cohabiting couples (N = 170 people; 85 couples) across the United States, I used multi-level path models to examine the level of tracking accuracy and bias (projection and mean-level) in people's judgments of their romantic partner's overall and daily external and internal stress and the degree of similarity between partners' stress. I also examined whether individual differences (i.e., stress communication; responsiveness; dyadic coping style; parental status, parental stress, pandemic stress) were associated with levels of accuracy and bias in partner stress perceptions and whether biased perceptions of partner stress (i.e., overperception and underperception), compared to accurate perceptions, were associated with conflict, relationship satisfaction, satisfaction with stress support, perceived positive dyadic coping, and perceived negative dyadic coping. Results showed that for overall stress and daily external stress, people were generally accurate in their perceptions—demonstrating both tracking accuracy and mean-level accuracy, but they also tended to be biased such that they projected their own stress experience onto their partner. In contrast, people did not demonstrate tracking accuracy in their perceptions of daily internal stress, but instead relied heavily on projection and tended to overperceive their partner's daily internal stress. Greater responsiveness and greater negative dyadic coping were associated with (open full item for complete abstract)
Committee: Judith Gere (Advisor)
Subjects: Psychology