Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


ysu1243439695.pdf (4.74 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

European Union vs. the United States: Recycling Policies and Management

Bolan, Michael
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ysu1243439695

Abstract Details

2009, Master of Science in Environmental Science, Youngstown State University, Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences.
Recycling diverts municipal solid waste (MSW) from landfills and preserves valuable resources by converting waste material into useful commodities. The concept of recycling materials of value is not new; however, it has become important in MSW management because of economic and environmental issues. Increasing the amount of recycled waste preserves natural resources by reducing the need for more and more landfills. The recycling activities from two study areas, Pordenone Province, Italy and Mahoning County, Ohio, United States of America (US) were considered to evaluate the inducements each area uses to maximize efforts for recycling. Italy is a member of the European Union (EU) and when comparing the percentages of the amount of waste that is recycled versus waste that is incinerated or landfilled among the EU countries, Italy ranks in the middle (Figure 1.0). The EU regulates the recycling management policies for Italy. Mahoning County, Ohio also has an established recycling program, defined by the federal and state Environmental Protection Agency. There are three specific recycling influences: regulations, regularity of MSW pick-up, and economics. Data were collected over three (3) years (2004-2006). Regulations exerted the greatest influence over recycling behavior in Italy followed by economics and regularity of pick-up services. Economics had the greatest influence on recycling in the US, followed by regularity of pick-up and finally regulations. Although waste generation (per capita) in the US is much greater than in Italy, the percentage of waste that US recycles is less than in Italy. This study examined the effectiveness of recycling practices in each study area and determined that practices from one country could be effective in the other and vice versa.
Alan Jacobs, PhD (Advisor)
Cynthia Hirtzel, PhD (Committee Member)
Isam Amin, PhD (Committee Member)
Ganesaratnam Balendiran, PhD (Committee Member)
James Petuch, BS in Ed (Committee Member)
105 p.
Environmental Science; Social Research
Recycling; Regulations; EU/USA differences; Municipal Solid Waste

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Bolan, M. (2009). European Union vs. the United States: Recycling Policies and Management [Master's thesis, Youngstown State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ysu1243439695

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Bolan, Michael. European Union vs. the United States: Recycling Policies and Management. 2009. Youngstown State University, Master's thesis. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ysu1243439695.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Bolan, Michael. "European Union vs. the United States: Recycling Policies and Management." Master's thesis, Youngstown State University, 2009. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ysu1243439695

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

ysu1243439695
1,872
© 2009, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Youngstown State University and OhioLINK.
Release 3.2.12