Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
BolinDissertation_FINAL_06_22_19.pdf (650.47 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Attitudes on Legal Insanity and the Impact of Race
Author Info
Bolin, Jerie J
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wsupsych1564414182185381
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2020, Doctor of Psychology (PsyD), Wright State University, School of Professional Psychology.
Abstract
Jurors, representatives of the communities from which they are selected, are tasked with the responsibility of reaching a verdict in an impartial, unbiased manner. Previous research has found that bias and negative attitudes impact juror decision-making, despite practices that are in place to dismiss potentially biased jurors, such as voir dire. Studies have found a correlation between racial biases and juror verdicts. Additionally, a correlation has also been found between insanity defense attitudes and a juror’s propensity to favor (or not favor) a Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) acquittal. However, there has been limited examination of the impact of racial bias on juror decision-making in cases of NGRI, as evidenced by a lack of available research in this area. The Insanity Defense Attitudes – Revised (IDA-R) scale is a validated measure of venirepersons (potential jurors) attitudes surrounding NGRI. The IDA-R and a demographic survey were issued to jury-eligible participants from a Midwestern state, following a NGRI case vignette featuring either a White or African American male defendant. All participants met minimum criteria to be an Ohio juror. Findings include the overestimation of NGRI pleas in criminal court, the underestimation of NGRI acquittals, and a correlation between higher IDA-R scale scores and Guilty verdicts among participants. Additionally, race of the participant appeared to predict final verdict for some groups.
Committee
LaTrelle Jackson, PhD, CCFC, ABPP (Committee Chair)
Michelle Schultz, PsyD (Committee Member)
Christy Tinch, PsyD (Committee Member)
Pages
115 p.
Subject Headings
Psychology
Keywords
NGRI, not guilty by reason of insanity, race, biases, implicit racial biases, bias, insanity defense attitudes scale, IDA-R, juror attitudes, legal insanity,
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Bolin, J. J. (2020).
Attitudes on Legal Insanity and the Impact of Race
[Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wsupsych1564414182185381
APA Style (7th edition)
Bolin, Jerie.
Attitudes on Legal Insanity and the Impact of Race.
2020. Wright State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wsupsych1564414182185381.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Bolin, Jerie. "Attitudes on Legal Insanity and the Impact of Race." Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wsupsych1564414182185381
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
wsupsych1564414182185381
Download Count:
849
Copyright Info
© 2019, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Wright State University Professional Psychology Program and OhioLINK.