Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
ComparingRF_FingperprintingPerformance_TravisSmith.pdf (1.21 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Comparing RF Fingerprinting Performance of Hobbyist and Commercial-Grade SDRs.
Author Info
Smith, Travis R.
ORCID® Identifier
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3603-1311
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1608139109925131
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2020, Master of Science in Electrical Engineering (MSEE), Wright State University, Electrical Engineering.
Abstract
Radio Frequency Fingerprinting (RFF) research typically uses expensive, laboratory grade receivers which have high dynamic range, very stable oscillators, large instantaneous bandwidth, multi-rate sampling, etc. In this study, the RFF effectiveness of lower grade receivers is considered. Using software-defined radios (SDRs) of different cost and performance, a linear regression model is developed to predict RFF performance. Unlike two previous studies of SDR effectiveness that used commercial and lab-grade SDRs, the experiment here focused on hobbyist and commercial-grade SDRs (RTL-SDR, B200-mini, N210). A regression model is proposed for a generic SDR. Using a full-factorial experiment matrix, the gain, sample rate, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were selected as the common control factors. The transmit sources were three commercially-available, general purpose, wireless transmitters of the same model. An SDR performance index (SPI) was developed from the percent correct classification using the Random Forest classifier for each SDR and for a generic SDR. The RFF results show that the lower-cost SDRs record the data with enough fidelity to achieve over 90% classification accuracy.
Committee
Michael A. Saville, Ph.D., P.E. (Committee Chair)
Saiyu Ren, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Henry Chen, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Joshua N. Ash, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Pages
61 p.
Subject Headings
Electrical Engineering
Keywords
Radio Frequency Fingerprinting
;
RFF
;
SDR
;
software defined radio
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Smith, T. R. (2020).
Comparing RF Fingerprinting Performance of Hobbyist and Commercial-Grade SDRs.
[Master's thesis, Wright State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1608139109925131
APA Style (7th edition)
Smith, Travis.
Comparing RF Fingerprinting Performance of Hobbyist and Commercial-Grade SDRs.
2020. Wright State University, Master's thesis.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1608139109925131.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Smith, Travis. "Comparing RF Fingerprinting Performance of Hobbyist and Commercial-Grade SDRs." Master's thesis, Wright State University, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1608139109925131
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
wright1608139109925131
Download Count:
2,181
Copyright Info
© 2020, some rights reserved.
Comparing RF Fingerprinting Performance of Hobbyist and Commercial-Grade SDRs. by Travis R. Smith is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Based on a work at etd.ohiolink.edu.
This open access ETD is published by Wright State University and OhioLINK.