Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


Hartel_Thesis_2018.05.07.pdf (1.1 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

The Role of Wildlife Value Orientations in Framing Interactions with Wildlife Near the Home: A Mixed-methods Analysis of Self-reported Problems with Wildlife

Hartel, Colleen M
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1525541681974028

Abstract Details

2018, Master of Science, Ohio State University, Environment and Natural Resources.
Human intolerance of wildlife is often associated with negative interactions (i.e., conflict) between humans and wildlife. While many studies of these conflicts focus on which species are involved and the extent of damage caused, few studies focus on understanding the psychological factors that shape how people talk about or “frame” such negative interactions. This investigation seeks to understand how situational-specific factors (e.g., the nature, extent, and frequency of previous interactions) and underlying psychological factors, such as wildlife value orientations, impact an individual’s framing of reported problems with wildlife. Using data from a survey of residents living in Washington state, we performed a mixed-methods analysis of 1,837 responses to an open-ended question asking participants to describe the problems they have experienced with wildlife near their homes. Environmental context (place of residence) played a role in the types of species and interactions that an individual identifies. Additionally, there is evidence that demographic (e.g., sex, age) and psychological factors impact what interactions may be the most salient to an individual. These results also indicate nuisance interactions, such as yard or structural damage, may be the most commonly experienced across groups. Other studies have found that nuisance interactions have greatest potential for social conflict over appropriate management decisions and acceptability of lethal control. Experience and engagement in attempts to mitigate problems with wildlife may explain some of this variability. Finally, recognizing the needs of both humans and wildlife was positively associated with describing a mitigation strategy, suggesting acceptance of “problems with wildlife” may be dependent on the ability of the individual to identify effective mitigation strategies.
Alia Dietsch, PhD (Advisor)
Robyn Wilson, PhD (Committee Member)
Jeremy Bruskotter, PhD (Committee Member)
69 p.
Wildlife Conservation; Wildlife Management
human-wildlife conflict; wildlife; wildlife conflict; wildlife conservation; wildlife management; environmental social science; wildlife value orientations

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Hartel, C. M. (2018). The Role of Wildlife Value Orientations in Framing Interactions with Wildlife Near the Home: A Mixed-methods Analysis of Self-reported Problems with Wildlife [Master's thesis, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1525541681974028

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Hartel, Colleen. The Role of Wildlife Value Orientations in Framing Interactions with Wildlife Near the Home: A Mixed-methods Analysis of Self-reported Problems with Wildlife. 2018. Ohio State University, Master's thesis. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1525541681974028.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Hartel, Colleen. "The Role of Wildlife Value Orientations in Framing Interactions with Wildlife Near the Home: A Mixed-methods Analysis of Self-reported Problems with Wildlife." Master's thesis, Ohio State University, 2018. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1525541681974028

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

osu1525541681974028
338
© 2018, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.