Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


Elias_Thesis_4_17_15.pdf (889.65 KB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Buccal and Lingual Differences of Peri-Implant Bone Quality

Elias, Kathy L
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1427546292

Abstract Details

2015, Master of Science, Ohio State University, Dentistry.
Objective: The objective of the current study was to examine whether peri-implant bone tissue properties at the buccal region are different from those at the lingual region as a result of growth factor treatments at post-implantation healing periods. Methods: Four dental implant groups were used: titanium (Ti) implants, alumina-blasted zirconia implants (ATZ-N), alumina-blasted zirconia implants with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) (ATZ-D), and alumina-blasted zirconia implants with rhBMP-2 (ATZ-B). These implants were placed in mandibles of six male dogs. Nanoindentation elastic modulus (E) and plastic hardness (H) were measured for the buccal and lingual bone tissues adjacent and away from the implants at 3 and 6 weeks post-implantation. A total of 2281 indentations were conducted for 48 placed implants. Results: The peri-implant buccal region had less bone quantity resulting from lower height and narrower width of bone tissue than the lingual region. Buccal bone tissues had significant greater mean values of E and H than lingual bone tissues at each distance and healing period (p<0.007). Nearly all implant treatment groups displayed lower mean values of the E at the lingual bone tissues than at the buccal bone tissues (p<0.046) although the difference was not significant for the Ti implant group (p=0.758). Conclusions: The DBM and rhBMP-2 treatments stimulated more peri-implant bone remodeling at the lingual region, producing more immature new bone tissues with lower E than at the buccal region. Clinical Significance: This finding suggests that the growth factor treatments to the zirconia implant system may help balance the quantity and quality differences between the peri-implant bone tissues.
Damian Lee, DDS, MS (Advisor)
William Brantley, PhD (Advisor)
DoGooyn Kim , PhD (Advisor)
49 p.
Biomechanics
Peri-implant bone, nanoindentation, growth factors, bone morphogenetic protein-2, bone remodeling

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Elias, K. L. (2015). Buccal and Lingual Differences of Peri-Implant Bone Quality [Master's thesis, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1427546292

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Elias, Kathy. Buccal and Lingual Differences of Peri-Implant Bone Quality. 2015. Ohio State University, Master's thesis. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1427546292.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Elias, Kathy. "Buccal and Lingual Differences of Peri-Implant Bone Quality." Master's thesis, Ohio State University, 2015. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1427546292

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

osu1427546292
1,283
© 2015, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.