Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
osu1337628161.pdf (2.14 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Responses of Grapevines to Timing and Method of Leaf Removal
Author Info
Chalfant, Patricia
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1337628161
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2012, Master of Science, Ohio State University, Horticulture and Crop Science.
Abstract
Several winegrapes grown in cool climates, including Vitis vinifera Cabernet Franc and Vitis sp. Chambourcin, benefit from crop reduction. The practice promotes timely fruit maturation and can improve fruit quality. Balanced pruning and cluster thinning are the cultural practices used to attain the desired crop load. However, crop reduction by cluster thinning is labor intensive, costly and typically not mechanized for winegrapes. In this study, the practice of early season leaf removal by hand and with a mechanized leaf remover is proposed as an alternate tool to reduce crop level, thereby optimizing crop load and fruit quality. The objectives were to determine the effects of the timing of leaf removal (pre-bloom, bloom, or fruitset) on yield components, crop load, fruit quality, and cold hardiness in Chambourcin and to 2) determine the effects of manual versus mechanical leaf removal at different phenological stages on yield components, growth, crop load, and fruit quality in Cabernet Franc. In Chambourcin, leaf removal at pre-bloom in 2010 and bloom in 2010 and 2011 reduced yield as compared to defoliation at fruitset and control (no removal). Early season leaf removal reduced crop load (Ravaz index) in both years. Defoliation at bloom increased bud lignification in both years and reduced bud injury in fall of 2010. Defoliation at pre-bloom reduced bud injury in winter in one of two years. In Cabernet Franc, manual leaf removal at pre-bloom and mechanical leaf removal at bloom reduced yield. Leaf removal had no negative effects on pH, titratable acidity, soluble solids, or total phenolics in either cultivar in either year. Early season leaf removal can be used to control yield without negatively impacting growth, cluster compactness, disease incidence, fruit composition, or lignification. It is concluded that early season leaf removal is a viable alternative to cluster thinning as a method of yield reduction in Chambourcin. Early season mechanical leaf removal is a viable alternative to manual leaf removal.
Committee
Imed Dami, Dr (Advisor)
Douglas Doohan, Dr (Committee Member)
Joseph Scheerens, Dr (Committee Member)
Michael Ellis, Dr (Committee Member)
Pages
113 p.
Subject Headings
Agriculture
;
Horticulture
Keywords
defoliation
;
leaf area
;
yield reduction
;
fruitset
;
crop load
;
fruit composition
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Chalfant, P. (2012).
Responses of Grapevines to Timing and Method of Leaf Removal
[Master's thesis, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1337628161
APA Style (7th edition)
Chalfant, Patricia.
Responses of Grapevines to Timing and Method of Leaf Removal.
2012. Ohio State University, Master's thesis.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1337628161.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Chalfant, Patricia. "Responses of Grapevines to Timing and Method of Leaf Removal." Master's thesis, Ohio State University, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1337628161
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1337628161
Download Count:
1,635
Copyright Info
© 2012, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.