Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


Vostal_Dissertation_FINAL.pdf (3.23 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Collegial Trust for School Improvement: A Case Study of K-12 General and Special Education Teachers

Vostal, Margaret
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1605004493242711

Abstract Details

2020, Doctor of Education (Ed.D.), Bowling Green State University, Leadership Studies.
Closing the gap between academic achievement of the highest and lowest performing students has been a target of state and federal legislation for almost two decades. Currently, public school leaders and teachers operate in a system in which student achievement data are tied to the performance evaluations of districts, schools, teachers, and principals. This high-stakes environment has engendered a climate in public education in which leaders and teachers must collaborate to deliver effective instruction or suffer ramifications for their failure to do so. Because relational trust supports effective collaboration between teachers, leaders of school reform should attend to relational trust to support reform efforts. But building relational trust during times of school reform may be difficult because a high stakes environment may not be conducive to collaboration. Therefore, school leaders may be faced with a paradox: trust building may jeopardized by the reform efforts for which trust is needed. The purpose of this study was to explore collaboration among teachers during school reform. Specifically, this study investigated collaboration between general and special educators, teachers’ perceptions of leader support for collaboration, and leaders’ perceptions of teacher collaboration. Participants in this study included 35 teachers and nine leaders from elementary, middle, and high schools in one school district. Results indicated that general and special educators often struggled to build relational trust. General and special educators who experienced trusting relationships, however, promoted symmetry between their roles and developed norms to support collaboration. Further, leader and teacher participants in this study both supported the notion that a trust paradox exists, suggesting that accountability pressures complicate trust building among colleagues. Participants identified several leader behaviors that were supportive of collaborative relationships among teachers as well as leader behaviors that did not support trust building. Findings from this study may offer guidance for leaders who want to support teacher collaboration to improve student achievement.
Christy Galletta Horner (Advisor)
Dryw Dworksy (Other)
Kristina LaVenia (Committee Member)
Chris Willis (Committee Member)
Kelly Wohlgamuth (Committee Member)
240 p.
Education; Educational Leadership
Collaboration; Trust; General Education; Special Education; School Improvement; Accountability

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Vostal, M. (2020). Collegial Trust for School Improvement: A Case Study of K-12 General and Special Education Teachers [Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1605004493242711

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Vostal, Margaret. Collegial Trust for School Improvement: A Case Study of K-12 General and Special Education Teachers. 2020. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1605004493242711.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Vostal, Margaret. "Collegial Trust for School Improvement: A Case Study of K-12 General and Special Education Teachers." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1605004493242711

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

bgsu1605004493242711
515
© 2020, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.