Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


bgsu1131386877.pdf (368.81 KB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Beyond Subjective Well-Being

Phillips, Pamela L
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1131386877

Abstract Details

2005, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, Philosophy, Applied.
The concept of well-being is relevant to a multitude of issues in the domains of ethics, law, medicine, mental health, and everyday decisionmaking. And yet while there seem to be some shared pre-theoretical intuitions about the nature of well-being, there is no widely accepted comprehensive account within the philosophical community. This essay takes up one strand of the discussion concerning well-being, namely what is the relationship between an individual's subjective stances, such as desiring, enjoying, or preferring, and his well-being. Subjectivism posits a dependency of well-being on the subjective stances of the individual, while objectivism denies this dependency. This essay takes Aristotle's eudaimonism as its point of departure. Aristotle's view is typically regarded as a paradigmatically objective account of well-being. Nonetheless, subjective stances do evidently play some role in well-being even according to Aristotle. This fact serves as impetus to consider accounts offered by current subjectivists as well as objections that are raised against them in the course of the debate. It is concluded that no existing objective account seems able to survive the counterexamples now standardly launched against them. Furthermore, subjectivism faces an additional problem that none of the considerations that are thought to motivate it in the first instance uniquely point to some version of subjectivism as the best available account. Thus, it is argued that subjectivism as a category of account is ill-founded. The account of well-being that satisfies the intuitions of both objective and subjective accounts while avoiding the major drawbacks of each is a hybrid view with elements of both the subjective and the objective. This view defines well-being as the development of our natural strengths as individuals and human beings plus endorsement in the form of autonomous choice to develop these strengths.
Fred Miller (Advisor)
147 p.
Philosophy
Well-Being; Subjectivism; Objectivism; Good for; Eudaimonia

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Phillips, P. L. (2005). Beyond Subjective Well-Being [Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1131386877

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Phillips, Pamela. Beyond Subjective Well-Being. 2005. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1131386877.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Phillips, Pamela. "Beyond Subjective Well-Being." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2005. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1131386877

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

bgsu1131386877
1,578
© 2005, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.