Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
SMITH_V4.pdf (922.78 KB)
Digital Accessibility Report
File List
SMITH_V4.pdf.accreport.html
(7.85 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Denial in the Anthropocene: Climate Change Beliefs and Self Control
Author Info
Smith, Adam J
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1710704438054409
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2024, Master of Arts (MA), Bowling Green State University, Sociology.
Abstract
A recent report released by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication found that only 61% of Americans believe that “global warming is mostly human-caused.” Moreover, a recent analysis from the Center for American Progress (2021) uncovered that 139 elected officials in the 117th Congress do not endorse or express concerns about the scientific validity of anthropogenic climate change. However, Powell (2017) examined 11,602 peer-reviewed articles examining anthropogenic climate change and found 100% consensus from the world’s leading scientists. Few studies have applied a theoretical perspective rooted in criminology to quantitatively analyze why individuals deny anthropogenic climate change. To address this gap in the research, I apply Gottfredson and Hirschi’s (1990) theory of self-control to anthropogenic climate change beliefs (ACCB). Additionally, I test whether education moderates the relationship between self-control and ACCB. This exploratory research employed original data collection by sampling respondents from CloudResearch’s Connect platform in 2023 (n = 648). Results from the multivariate analyses show that self-control is not significantly associated with ACCB, nor does education moderate the relationship between self-control and ACCB. However, a significant association (p < .001) between Akers’ (1998) social learning theory and ACCB was uncovered. Further research should analyze the four core elements (i.e., differential association, definitions, differential reinforcement, and imitation) of Akers’ (1998) social learning theory to better understand the intricacies and drivers of these learned beliefs.
Committee
Thomas Mowen, Ph.D. (Committee Chair)
John Boman, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Stephen Demuth, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Pages
151 p.
Subject Headings
Sociology
Keywords
Environmental Attitudes
;
Climate Change
;
Climate Beliefs
;
Climate Change Denialism
;
Theory of Self-Control
;
Social Learning Theory
;
Cognitive Deviance
;
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Smith, A. J. (2024).
Denial in the Anthropocene: Climate Change Beliefs and Self Control
[Master's thesis, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1710704438054409
APA Style (7th edition)
Smith, Adam.
Denial in the Anthropocene: Climate Change Beliefs and Self Control.
2024. Bowling Green State University, Master's thesis.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1710704438054409.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Smith, Adam. "Denial in the Anthropocene: Climate Change Beliefs and Self Control." Master's thesis, Bowling Green State University, 2024. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1710704438054409
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
bgsu1710704438054409
Download Count:
332
Copyright Info
© 2024, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.